- Hasura GraphQL Engine
Configuring Permission Rules¶
Table of contents
Introduction¶
Access control rules in Hasura are defined at a role, table and action (insert, update, select, delete) level granularity:
Requests to Hasura should contain the reserved session variable X-Hasura-Role
to indicate the requesting
user’s role, and the table and action information is inferred from the request itself. This information is used
to determine the right permission rule to be applied (if one has been defined) to the incoming request.
Hasura converts GraphQL queries (or mutations/subscriptions) into a single SQL query that is executed on the configured database instance. Hasura also includes constraints from permission rules in the SQL query itself.
Permissions are essentially a combination of boolean expressions and column selections that impose constraints on the data being returned or modified.
Let’s take a look at the different configuration options available to define a permission rule. Permission rules are defined for each role, table, operation (insert, select, update, delete) by using the console or the metadata APIs for permissions.
Operation permissions¶
Select permissions¶
For select
operations or for GraphQL queries, you can configure the following:
Insert permissions¶
For insert
operations or for GraphQL mutations of the type insert, you can configure the following:
Update permissions¶
For update
operations or for GraphQL mutations of the type update, you can configure the following:
Delete permissions¶
For delete
operations or for GraphQL mutations of the type delete, you can configure the following:
Permission categories¶
Row-level permissions¶
Row-level premissions are boolean expressions that help you restrict access to rows depending on the
operation being performed. E.g. in the case of select
, your boolean expression is run on every row to
determine whether that row can be read. In the case of insert
, the boolean expression determines whether or not the mutation is allowed.
Row-level permissions are defined using operators, static values, values in columns (including those in related tables or nested objects) and session variables.
Using column operators to build rules¶
Type-based operators (depending on the column type) are available for constructing row-level permissions. You can use the same operators that you use to filter query results along with a few others to define permission rules.
See the API reference for a list of all supported column operators.
For example, the following two images illustrate the different operators available for integer
and text
types:
Using boolean expressions¶
The following is an example of a simple boolean expression to restrict access for select
to rows where
the value in the id
column is greater than 10:
You can define permissions using boolean expressions in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: author
select_permissions:
- role: user
permission:
columns: []
filter:
id:
_gt: 10
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can define permissions using boolean expressions when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "author",
"role": "user",
"permission": {
"columns": "*",
"filter": {
"id": {"_gt": 10}
}
}
}
}
You can construct more complex boolean expressions using the _and
, _or
and not
operators:
For example, using the _and
operator, you can construct a rule to restrict access for select
to rows where
the value in the id
column is greater than 10 and the value in the name
column starts with “a”
or “A”:
You can define permissions using the _and
operator in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: author
select_permissions:
- role: user
permission:
columns: []
filter:
_and:
- id: {_gt: 10}
- name: {_ilike: a%}
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can define permissions using the _and
operator when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "author",
"role": "user",
"permission": {
"columns": "*",
"filter": {
"$and": [
{
"id": {
"_gt": 10
}
},
{
"name": {
"_ilike": "a%"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
Using session variables¶
Session variables that have been resolved from authentication tokens by either your authentication webhook or by Hasura using the JWT configuration are available for constructing row-level permissions.
For example, to allow an author
to access only their articles, you can use the X-Hasura-User-ID
session variable
to construct a rule to restrict access for select
to rows in the articles
table where the value in the
id
column is equal to the value in the session variable (assuming this variable is being used to indicate
the author’s ID):
You can define session variables in permissions in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: article
select_permissions:
- role: author
permission:
columns:
- title
- content
filter:
id:
_eq: X-Hasura-User-Id
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can define session variables in permissions tables when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "article",
"role": "author",
"permission": {
"columns": "*",
"filter": {
"id": "X-Hasura-User-Id"
}
}
}
}
Array session variables in permission rules
Support for using session variables for array operators like _in
, _nin
, _has_any_keys
,
_has_all_keys
is available in versions v.1.0.0-beta.3
and above.
When you use array operators such as _in
in the permissions builder in the Hasura console, it will automatically open an array for your values.
If your session variable value is already an array, you can click the [X-Hasura-Allowed-Ids]
suggestion to remove the brackets and set your
session variable in its place.
Using relationships or nested objects¶
You can leverage table relationships to define permission rules with fields from a nested object.
For example, let’s say you have an object relationship called agent
from the authors
table to another table
called agent
(an author can have an agent) and we want to allow users with the role agent
to access
the details of the authors who they manage in authors
table. We can define the following permission rule
that uses the aforementioned object relationship:
You add permissions using relationships or nested objects in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: author
select_permissions:
- role: agent
permission:
columns: []
filter:
agent:
agent_id:
_eq: X-Hasura-User-Id
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You add permissions using relationships or nested objects when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "author",
"role": "agent",
"permission": {
"columns": "*",
"filter": {
"agent": {
"agent_id": {
"_eq": "X-Hasura-User-Id"
}
}
}
}
}
}
This permission rule reads as “if the author’s agent’s id
is the same as the requesting user’s
id
, allow access to the author’s details.”
Array and object relationships work similarly
- The above example would have worked even if the relationship were an array relationship. In our example,
the corresponding rule for an array relationship would have read “if any of this author’s agents’
id
is the same as the requesting user’sid
, allow access to the author’s details”. - You can also check out this more elaborate example.
Using unrelated tables / views¶
You can use the _exists
operator to set a permission rule based on tables/views that are not related to
our table.
For example, say we want to allow a user to insert
an article
only if the value of the allow_article_create
column in the users
table is set to true
. Let’s assume the user’s id is passed in the X-Hasura-User-ID
session variable.
You can set permissions using unrelated tables in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: article
insert_permissions:
- role: user
permission:
check:
_exists:
_where:
_and:
- id: {_eq: X-Hasura-User-Id}
- allow_article_create: {_eq: true}
_table:
schema: public
name: users
columns:
- content
- id
- title
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can set permissions for unrelated tables when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_insert_permission",
"args": {
"table": "article",
"role": "user",
"permission": {
"columns": "*",
"check": {
"$exists": {
"_table": "users",
"_where": {
"$and": [
{
"id": "X-Hasura-User-Id"
},
{
"allow_article_create": true
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
}
This permission rule reads as “if there exists a row in the table users
whose id
is the same as the requesting user’s
id
and has the allow_article_create
column set to true, allow access to insert articles.”
Column-level permissions¶
Column-level permissions determine access to columns in the rows that are accessible based on row-level permissions.
You can set column-level permissions in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: article
select_permissions:
- role: author
permission:
columns:
- author_id
- id
- content
- title
filter:
author_id:
_eq: X-Hasura-User-Id
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can set column-level permissions when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "article",
"role": "author",
"permission": {
"columns": [
"id",
"title",
"content",
"author_id"
],
"filter": {
"author_id": "X-Hasura-User-Id"
}
}
}
}
In this example, the role author
has only partial access to columns of the accessible rows for
the select
operation.
Row fetch limit¶
In the case of select
operations, the number of rows to be returned in the response can be limited
using this configuration:
You can set a row fetch limit for a table in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: author
select_permissions:
- role: user
permission:
columns:
- id
- name
filter:
user_id:
_gt: 10
limit: 20
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can a row fetch limit for a table when using the permissions metadata API:
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "author",
"role": "user",
"permission": {
"columns": "*",
"filter": {
"id": {
"_gt": 10
}
},
"limit": 20
}
}
}
In the above example, this configuration restricts the number of accessible rows (based on the rule:
{"id":{"_eq":"X-Hasura-User-Id"}}
) to 20.
Aggregation queries permissions¶
In the case of select
operations, access to aggregation queries
can be enabled for a given role using this configuration.
You can allow aggregation query permissions in the tables.yaml
file inside the metadata
directory:
- table:
schema: public
name: author
select_permissions:
- role: user
permission:
columns:
- id
- name
filter:
user_id:
_gt: 10
allow_aggregations: true
Apply the metadata by running:
hasura metadata apply
You can allow aggregation query permissions when using the permissions metadata API
POST /v1/query HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
X-Hasura-Role: admin
{
"type": "create_select_permission",
"args": {
"table": "author",
"role": "user",
"permission": {
"columns": [
"id",
"name"
],
"filter": {
"id": "X-Hasura-User-Id"
},
"allow_aggregations": true
}
}
}
In the above example, the role user
is allowed to make aggregation queries.
Column presets¶
While this is strictly not a permission configuration, defining
role-based column presets on any column automatically
removes access to it. This preset can be defined for insert
and update
operations. This configuration
is also very useful to avoid sending sensitive user-information in the request and leverage session variables
or static data instead.
Backend only¶
If a permission is marked as backend_only
, the mutation is accessible to the
given role only if x-hasura-use-backend-only-permissions
session variable exists and is set to true
and request is made with x-hasura-admin-secret
set if any auth is configured.
This might be useful if you would like to hide a mutation from the public facing API but allow access to it via a “trusted backend”.
Note
Setting backend-only
is currently available for insert mutations only.